Costs and Proportionality: Marcus v. Cochrane 2014 ONCA 207

by: , March 26, 2014

The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Marcus v. Cochrane (released March 20, 2014) provides a clear statement of the court’s willingness to take a hard look at the proportionality of costs awards, and reduce costs substantially, if necessary. The appeal arose out of a claim that Louise Marcus (“Marcus”) brought against her former lawyer, Carol Ann…read more

Objections to Trustee Accounts Must Be Specific

by: , March 18, 2014

In reasons delivered last week in Michipicoten First Nation v. Michipicoten First Nation Community Trust, Justice Varpio emphasized that objections to trustee accounts must be specific.  If objections are too vague, then the objectors run the risk of having their objections struck.  An added risk of delivering vague objections is that the lack of specificity will result…read more

Trust In The Rules Of Civil Procedure To Protect Beneficiaries And Litigants

by: , March 10, 2014

The Ottawa case of Hawkins v Hawkins Estate provides a well articulated summary of the grounds for the removal of estate trustees. In addition, it provides an interesting discussion regarding disclosure of a solicitor’s file after the death of the testator. The late John Hawkins ran a farming business near Ottawa and owned large parcels of land….read more

Limitation Period for Estate Claims

by: , March 6, 2014

Cerquiera v University Health Network presents an interesting discussion of s. 38(3) of the Trustee Act, which establishes a 2-year limitation period on any action commenced by or against an estate. The Cerquiera estate sued the University Hospital for negligence in relation to the death of Mr. Cerquiera.  Mr. Cerquiera died in 2009; the action…read more

B.C Estate Trustee Ordered to Pay Back Estate Funds

by: , February 28, 2014

Estate Trustees are often under pressure to distribute estate funds to beneficiaries as soon as possible.  Beneficiaries may express frustration about having to wait for an estate trustee to receive a tax clearance certificate or respond to other administrative issues, such as collecting assets.  When probate has not been granted to an estate trustee because…read more

Summary Judgment – No Longer for the Brave or Foolhardy

by: , February 20, 2014

The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) in Hryniak heralds a sea change in summary judgment motions in Ontario and will have a profound impact on estate litigation. Many lawyers in Ontario have long groused that the Ontario Court of Appeal (OCA) was overly restrictive in its interpretation of summary judgment rules both before…read more

Be Careful What You Wish For – You Just Might Waive Solicitor-Client Privilege

by: , February 7, 2014

The recent Ontario Superior Court decision of Lamoureux v Lamoureux illustrates the care with which clients and counsel must take when submitting evidence to court. Without proper forethought, a party may unintentionally waive solicitor-client privilege. André Lamoureux brought an action against Charles Lamoureux in 2007 (unfortunately, the recent decision does not explain what the originating…read more

Limitation Period Precludes Motion to Set Aside Releases

by: , January 24, 2014

In the usual litigation battle, a release operates as a “shield” in the sense that if a beneficiary sues an estate trustee, the estate trustee can use the release as a defence.  In Re: Sheard, the estate trustees were able to use signed releases to preclude them from having to pass their accounts for the period…read more

A Wedding, A Will Signing, and a Witness

by: , January 16, 2014

In Zerbinati v. Zerbinati 2013 CanLII 86428 (ON SC), the respondents to an application for the determination of the validity of the last will and testament of Valentino Mario Zerbinati (“Valentino”) brought a motion for “non-suit” on the grounds that the formal validity of Valentino’s Will had not been established. The applicants were the testator’s son, Valentino…read more

What’s My Share?

by: , January 8, 2014

Gail Evans died intestate on July 30, 1992.  She was survived by her two sons from a first marriage, Richard and Donald, and by her second husband, Carlton.  Carlton was the administrator (i.e. estate trustee) of Gail’s estate.  The parties agreed Carlton was entitled to a preferential share of $75,000 and one third of the…read more