Categories
- Capacity
- Costs
- Court Procedure
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Capacity Litigation
- Contested Passing of Accounts
- Court Applications to Interpret a Will or Trust
- Court Applications to Remove an Executor / Estate Trustee
- Court Applications to Vary a Trust
- Dependant’s Relief Claims
- Estate Trustee During Litigation
- Guardianship Applications
- Other Claims & Remedies Against Estates
- Solicitor’s Negligence
- Spousal Elections
- Will Challenges
- Estate Mediation
- Estate Planning
- Family Cottage
- Forms of Relief
- In The News
- Joint Assets
- Legal Resources
- Limitation Period
- Mediation
- Power of Attorney
- Trusts
- Uncategorized
- Valuation of Estate Assets
A Touch of Modernity
In its costs decision for Campbell v. Evert (previously blogged about here), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice further distilled the rationale and policy reasons informing the “modern approach” to fixing costs in estate litigation. Background As frequent readers of this blog may recall, Dr. Ewert (the “Deceased”) passed away in 2011. She left behind…read more
The 6ix or the 226? That is the Question
Where does one commence a legal proceeding? When can one transfer a proceeding to one’s own hometown? These are simple enough questions, but with answers that may surprise you. The recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision of Estate of Byung Sun Im, deceased, 2018 ONSC 2223, set out the answers clearly. Background Byung Sun…read more
But Everything’s Depending on the Way the Wind May Blow [1]
Can an estate trustee move to strike a beneficiary’s Notice of Objection to Accounts in the face of their Application to Pass Accounts, based on any of the Limitations Act, 2002, and/or laches and acquiescence? This was the discreet, though important, issue considered by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Wall Estate, 2018 ONSC…read more
The Utility (or lack thereof) of Extrinsic Evidence when Interpreting a Will
Can one rely on extrinsic evidence (i.e. evidence that relates to a will but is not contained in it) to establish the intentions of a testator? This was a question recently considered by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Campbell v. Evert [1]. Background Dr. Ewert had two children, Monica and Peter. Dr. Ewert…read more
The Claim Not Taken.
The Ontario Court of Appeal’s reasoning in Bennett v. Bennett Estate[1] is illustrative of the fact that if one is faced with two means of advancing a claim (whether they diverge in a yellow wood or not is not important here), one must be careful when deciding which claim to make. Moreover, the claim must…read more
I Hate to be a Suspicious Aloysius on You – but Did the Deceased Have Testamentary Capacity?
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision (Stekar v. Wilcox[1]) reinforces what is required to prove well-established grounds for challenging a will: suspicious circumstance and testamentary capacity. Background Jerald P. McNamara (the “Deceased”) died on June 18, 2012. His friend of over 40 years, Thomas, stood to inherit his entire estate under the terms of…read more
Updates from All About Estates December 2017
Curtailing Frivolous Will Changes Written by Rebecca Studin Estate litigators would be wise to sharpen their skills and revisit what it means to launch a will challenge when confronted with only the flimsiest of evidence. Continue Reading . . . You Can’t Gift What You Don’t Have Written By Jacob Kaufman While Mary had more than…read more
A Brief Review of Solicitor’s Negligence
Claims against solicitors for negligence often arise in the context of estates cases, whether it be the failure of a lawyer to ensure that a testator’s wishes are accurately reflected in his/her will, to neglecting to confirm the testator had the requisite capacity and was not subject to undue influence in executing his/her last will….read more
The Benefits of Comprehensive Releases
When combatants settle a lawsuit, they often exchange mutual releases – that is, they release each other from all and any possible claims arising out of the issues raised in the litigation. However, releases can be the bane of a lawyer’s existence when it comes to getting the words just right. Clients don’t think they…read more
No Undue Influence, Says Court of Appeal
Rita and her late husband Frank built a successful business together in the course of their lengthy marriage. Unfortunately, there is a struggle between Rita’s twin sons (both named Jean) over who should act as their mother’s attorney for property, devastating both the family’s finances and relationship. The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal of…read more