Categories
- Capacity
- Costs
- Court Procedure
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Capacity Litigation
- Contested Passing of Accounts
- Court Applications to Interpret a Will or Trust
- Court Applications to Remove an Executor / Estate Trustee
- Court Applications to Vary a Trust
- Dependant’s Relief Claims
- Estate Trustee During Litigation
- Guardianship Applications
- Other Claims & Remedies Against Estates
- Solicitor’s Negligence
- Spousal Elections
- Will Challenges
- Estate Mediation
- Estate Planning
- Family Cottage
- Forms of Relief
- In The News
- Joint Assets
- Legal Resources
- Limitation Period
- Mediation
- Power of Attorney
- Trusts
- Uncategorized
- Valuation of Estate Assets
Posts Categorized: Will Challenges
24 ResultsThe Terrifying “In Terrorem” Clause
OoooooooooOOO! It is the scariest clause around; more frightening to beneficiaries than a killer Santa “clause”. Also called a no-contest clause, an in terrorem clause translates literally to “in fear” in Latin. In the estate planning context, it is a clause which forces or prohibits beneficiaries from doing something, using the fear of a loss…read more
Retrospective Capacity Assessments
Whether a deceased person had testamentary capacity to execute his or her will is a question often raised in estate litigation and is the subject of many will challenges. A contemporaneous assessment of a testator’s capacity is not always conducted, and sometimes, even if such an assessment was done, it may be flawed or unreliable…read more
A Tale of Two Suicide Notes
2020 was an unusual year. Not only was there a global pandemic, but by sheer coincidence there was not one, but two estates applications in different provinces to determine whether a suicide note was a valid will. While the suicide note in Ontario was not found to be a valid Will, the one in British…read more
The Costs of Litigation and the Loser Pays Principle
When new clients embarks on litigation (to challenge a will or to remove an executor, for example), one of the first questions I am asked is whether they can recover their legal fees or costs from the estate or trust (as we all know, litigation can be expensive). The expectation is that the estate or…read more
The Revival of Unconscionable Procurement
The administrations of some estates simply do not move forward smoothly. The Elias Gefen estate is one such estate. In Gefen v. Gaertner, 2019 ONSC 6015, Justice Kimmel addressed multiple issues which had stopped the administration from moving forward, ranging from mutual wills to secret trust agreements. Justice Kimmel also applied, for the first time…read more
Clash of the Limitation Periods
The Limitations Act, 2002, SO 2002, c 24, Sch B, brought order and clarity to limitation periods in Ontario. However, the Limitations Act did not displace all existing limitation periods established by statute. Several carve-outs which are particularly relevant to estates litigators includes the Real Property Limitations Act, RSO 1990, c L.15 and s. 38(3)…read more
Minimum Evidentiary Threshold for Will Challenges
What is the minimum level of evidence to be met before a court allows a will challenge to proceed? The recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Naismith v. Clarke, 2019 ONSC 5280 (“Naismith”) sets out a useful overview for the circumstances under which a court may allow a will challenge to move forward….read more
40oz. to Testamentary Freedom
Is the fact that one is a chronic alcoholic enough to deprive them of their testamentary freedom? In Dujardin v. Dujardin, 2018 ONCA 597, the Court of Appeal for Ontario explored this issue when it was tasked with determining the validity of two wills that were executed by a known drunkard. Background Jacques Henry Dujardin…read more
A Touch of Modernity
In its costs decision for Campbell v. Evert (previously blogged about here), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice further distilled the rationale and policy reasons informing the “modern approach” to fixing costs in estate litigation. Background As frequent readers of this blog may recall, Dr. Ewert (the “Deceased”) passed away in 2011. She left behind…read more
I Hate to be a Suspicious Aloysius on You – but Did the Deceased Have Testamentary Capacity?
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision (Stekar v. Wilcox[1]) reinforces what is required to prove well-established grounds for challenging a will: suspicious circumstance and testamentary capacity. Background Jerald P. McNamara (the “Deceased”) died on June 18, 2012. His friend of over 40 years, Thomas, stood to inherit his entire estate under the terms of…read more