Court Procedure

You Can’t Have It All: Hybrid Trials, Limited Discovery, and Modest Estates

Lorraine Coombs died on April 27, 2012, leaving an estate worth approximately $756,249.00.  Her Last Will and Testament left her house and the residue of her estate to one of her four daughters, Susan Coombs (“Susan”).  Two of her other daughters, Diane Fergueson (“Diane”) and Charlene Coombs (“Charlene”), each received $60,000 and another daughter, Donna […]

Court Procedure, Estate Administration, Estate Litigation, Will Challenges

What Not to Wear: Court Edition

Effective November 18, 2013, there are some important procedural changes affecting estate, trust, and capacity matters in Toronto. For some time now, the Toronto court has maintained a separate “Estates List” to hear all matters relating to the administration of trusts and estates and substitute decision making.  As an estates litigator, I have been an

Court Procedure, Estate Litigation

Proper Lawyer Behaviour on Discovery, in the Age of Rob Ford

Examinations for discovery can afford an excellent opportunity to determine the strength of the opposing party’s position. The discovery process also provides a chance to see a lawyer’s oral advocacy skills in action. But sometimes, a lawyer’s behaviour has the effect of disrupting the discovery process. In Tondera v. Vukadinovic, 2013 ONSC 6888 (CANLii), defence counsel

Costs, Court Procedure

Lawyer’s Questionnaire Admitted to Probate as a Will

Courts are sometimes asked to determine if a “testamentary-like” document is a will.  In British Columbia, an executor brought an action to prove in solemn form that a questionnaire that the testator (“Ms. Garnett”) filled out and signed before two witnesses shortly before her death was a will that could be submitted for probate. Ms. Garnett was

Court Applications to Interpret a Will or Trust, Court Procedure, Estate Litigation, Other Claims & Remedies Against Estates

If There is a Valid POA, the Court Cannot Order a Guardianship

The recent decision in Lehtonen v. Neill serves as a useful reminder of the sometimes overlooked subsection 22(3) of the Substitute Decisions Act.   This provision prohibits the court from appointing a guardian where the court is satisfied that decision making for the incapable person can be met by a less intrusive means.  It says: The Court shall not

Capacity Litigation, Court Procedure, Guardianship Applications
Scroll to Top